Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 10;13:39. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-13-39

Table 5.

Comparison of strain variables between the two groups by X-strain analysis

Variables Patients group Control group P value
LS-D (%)
1.936 ± 0.9507
1.601 ± 0.5719
0.1136
LS-DT (ms)
359.5 ± 78.11
379.2 ± 138.7
0.7695
LS-TD (ms)
65.86 ± 49.97
61.64 ± 36.65
0.9615
CS-D (%)
22.51 ± 7.056
21.72 ± 7.576
0.5789
CS-DT (ms)
341.9 ± 77.56
369.0 ± 78.26
0.0494*
CS-TD (ms)
132.6 ± 52.33
151.3 ± 72.17
0.2715
RS (%)
3.191 ± 1.212
3.318 ± 1.586
0.6541
RS-T (ms) 276.6 ± 45.37 268.4 ± 62.3 0.3850

Notes: *Value between controls and patients with diabetes P < 0.05. Data are presented as means ± standard deviation.

Abbreviations:CS-D circumferential strain difference; CS-DT the time of circumferential peak strain difference; CS-TD the time difference of circumferential peak strain; LS-D longitudinal strain difference; LS-DT the time of longitudinal peak strain difference; LS-TD the time difference of longitudinal peak strain; RS radial strain; RS-T the time of radial peak strain.