Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 24.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Jul 12;31(10):1668–1676. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2013.05.012

Table 4a.

Stenosis classifications by MS type using 3D CE MRAV.*

3D CE MRAV PP PP% SP SP% RR RR%
R Carotid Ectasia 0 0.0% 4 9.1% 2 2.3%
L Carotid Ectasia 2 5.1% 6 13.6% 13 14.9%
R Enhancement Delay 2 5.1% 4 9.1% 1 1.1%
L Enhancement Delay 1 2.6% 1 2.3% 1 1.1%
R Aplasia 0 0.0% 1 2.3% 0 0.0%
L Aplasia 1 2.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
R T1 Atresia 1 2.6% 1 2.3% 0 0.0%
L T1 Atresia 2 5.1% 3 6.8% 1 1.1%
R C6 Atresia 1 2.6% 2 4.5% 0 0.0%
L C6 Atresia 1 2.6% 4 9.1% 4 4.6%
R C2 Atresia 1 2.6% 2 4.5% 2 2.3%
L C2 Atresia 5 12.8% 4 9.1% 5 5.7%
R Diffuse 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 2.3%
L Diffuse 3 7.7% 1 2.3% 4 4.6%
R T1 No signal 1 2.6% 2 4.5% 0 0.0%
R C6 No signal 1 2.6% 2 4.5% 0 0.0%
R C2 No signal 0 0.0% 2 4.5% 2 2.3%
L T1 No signal 3 7.7% 3 6.8% 1 1.1%
L C6 No signal 1 2.6% 5 11.4% 4 4.6%
L C2 No signal 3 7.7% 3 6.8% 4 4.6%
R T1 Stenosis 5 12.8% 7 15.9% 16 18.4%
R C6 Stenosis 4 10.3% 4 9.1% 3 3.4%
R C2 Stenosis 0 0.0% 1 2.3% 1 1.1%
L T1 Stenosis 7 17.9% 6 13.6% 20 23.0%
L C6 Stenosis 10 25.6% 5 11.4% 12 13.8%
L C2 Stenosis 2 5.1% 2 4.5% 5 5.7%
R Stenosis* 13 33.3% 15 34.1% 24 27.6%
L Stenosis* 20 51.3% 17 38.6% 38 43.7%
*

The number of patients with stenosis independent of how many criteria were used.