Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 24.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Jul 12;31(10):1668–1676. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2013.05.012

Table 4b.

Stenosis and banding classifications by MS type using 2D TOF-MRV.

2D TOF-MRV PP PP% SP SP% RR RR%
R Diffuse 1 2.6% 2 4.5% 1 1.1%
L Diffuse 1 2.6% 3 6.8% 3 3.4%
R T1 Stenosis 14 35.9% 12 27.3% 27 31.0%
R C6 Stenosis 6 15.4% 7 15.9% 13 14.9%
R C2 Stenosis 2 5.1% 4 9.1% 6 6.9%
L T1 Stenosis 14 35.9% 11 25.0% 29 33.3%
L C6 Stenosis 8 20.5% 5 11.4% 19 21.8%
L C2 Stenosis 4 10.3% 3 6.8% 9 10.3%
R T1 Stenosis 1 2.6% 3 6.8% 1 1.1%
R C6 Stenosis 2 5.1% 4 9.1% 1 1.1%
R C2 Stenosis 2 5.1% 3 6.8% 1 1.1%
L T1 Stenosis 3 7.7% 6 13.6% 3 3.4%
L C6 Stenosis 7 17.9% 6 13.6% 5 5.7%
L C2 Stenosis 6 15.4% 6 13.6% 8 9.2%
R Banding** 9 23.1% 11 25.0% 15 17.2%
L Banding** 12 30.8% 13 29.5% 26 29.9%
R Stenosis* 18 46.2% 18 40.9% 37 42.5%
L Stenosis* 24 61.5% 22 50.0% 44 50.6%
*

The number of patients with stenosis independent of how many criteria were used.

**

Banding not included in stenosis classification.