Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 24.
Published in final edited form as: J Biol Chem. 2007 Dec 4;283(6):3487–3496. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M707630200

TABLE 1. Model discrimination analysis for 4MP and IND inhibition of CYP2E1 pNP activity.

Tested models are shown in Scheme 2. In all cases, the substrate is a homotypic allosteric effector; however, other possible effector roles between substrate (S) and inhibitor (I) are indicated. P indicates the number of adjustable parameters for the model; RSS indicates the relative sum of the squares; ΔAICc shows the increase in the second-order Akaike information criterion relative to the best model (ΔAICc 0); w indicates the Akaike weight such that 0.10 = 10% probability.

Model Allosteric effector P 4MP
IND
RSS ΔAICc w RSS ΔAICc w
Single-site inhibition 1 None 4 0.07145 43.3 0.0000 0.01465 0 0.9525
Two-site inhibition
2a S, I 6 0.02859 0 0.9998 0.01465 6.00 0.0473
2b S 5 0.04449 20.8 0.0003 0.02471 21.7 0.0000
2c I 5 0.04414 20.4 0.0004 0.04207 40.9 0.0000
2d None 4 0.04404 17.7 0.0014 0.02342 16.9 0.0002