Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 17.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Funct Mater. 2013 Jun 27;23(47):5833–5839. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201300483

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(A, B) SEM and 3D optical profile of 3D woven PCL scaffold surface. Outlined area in panel A denotes total scanned area in panel B. (C) Cross-sectional image of 3D woven PCL scaffold. (D, E) SEM and 3D optical profile of 3D woven PCL-Alg/PAAm IPN composite surface. Outlined area in panel D denotes total scanned area in panel E. (F) Cross-sectional image of 3D woven PCL-Alg/PAAm IPN composite scaffold. (G, H) SEM and 3D optical profile of Alg/PAAm IPN surface. (I) Average RMS of the 3D woven PCL scaffold (scaffold), Alg/PAAm IPN (hydrogel), and 3D woven PCL-Alg/PAAm IPN composite (composite) constructs. * P < 0.05 for hydrogel vs. scaffold & composite. + P < 0.05 for composite vs. scaffold and hydrogel. All scale bars = 200 µm.