Table 2. Statistical model parameter estimates of modern and fossil corals at Nagura Bay.
Sample | Responseparameter | Explanatory parameters | AIC | Parameters | Slope | Error ofslope |
Modern | Calcification rate | Annual SST+Ba/Ca peak | 9.2 | AnnualSST | −0.77 | 0.32 |
Annual SST+Ba/Ca peak+Prep. | 10 | Ba/Capeak | −1.78 | 0.07 | ||
DHM+Annual SST+Ba/Ca peak | 10.6 | |||||
Extension rate | Annual SST+Ba/Ca peak | −7.3 | AnnualSST | −0.40 | 0.17 | |
DHM+Ba/Ca peak | −7.2 | Ba/Capeak | −0.82 | 0.36 | ||
DHM+Annual SST+Ba/Ca peak | −6.7 | |||||
Skeletal density | Annual SST+Ba/Ca peak+Prep. | −26.4 | AnnualSST | −0.25 | 0.18 | |
Annual SST+Ba/Ca peak | −25.6 | Ba/Capeak | −0.62 | 0.10 | ||
DHM+Annual SST+Ba/Capeak+Prep. | −25.2 | Prep. | 9.27E-05 | 6.25E-05 | ||
1.2 kyr BP | Calcification rate | None | 4.6 | – | ||
Annual SST | 6.3 | |||||
DHM+Annual SST | 6.3 | |||||
Extension rate | None | −6.9 | – | |||
DHM+Annual SST | −6 | |||||
DHM | −5.5 | |||||
Skeletal density | DHM | −22.6 | DHM | 0.03 | 0.02 | |
Minimum SST | −21.9 | |||||
Annual SST | −21.6 | |||||
3.5 kyr BP | Calcification rate | None | 59 | – | ||
Annual SST | 59.8 | |||||
DHM | 60.7 | |||||
Extension rate | DHM | 33.6 | DHM | −0.07 | 0.07 | |
Annual SST | 34.4 | |||||
Minimum SST | 35.3 | |||||
Skeletal density | DHM | −37.7 | DHM | 0.05 | 0.02 | |
DHM+Annual SST | −38.6 | |||||
Annual SST | −38.5 |
Bold text indicates the selected models. Prep: precipitation.