Table 4. Interactive effect of plant and animal/human lures on anopheline trap captures using MM-X traps.
| Species | Treatment | N | Without CO2 | With CO2 | ||||
| n | IRR (95% CI) | P-value | n | IRR (95% CI) | P-value | |||
| An. gambiae s.l. | Socks | 9 | 48 | 1.0 | 166 | 1.0 | ||
| LO | 9 | 90 | 1.7 (1.21–2.49) | <0.01 | 237 | 1.4 (1.15–1.71) | <0.001 | |
| Blend F | 9 | 69 | 1.4 (0.95–2.02) | 0.09 | 181 | 1.1 (0.88–1.34) | 0.42 | |
| LO+Blend F | 9 | 62 | 1.3 (0.90–1.94) | 0.15 | 152 | 0.9 (0.73–1.14) | 0.43 | |
| LO+Socks | 9 | 79 | 1.4 (1.00–2.11) | <0.05 | 256 | 1.5 (1.27–1.88) | <0.001 | |
| An. funestus s.l. | Socks | 9 | 23 | 1.0 | 34 | 1.0 | ||
| LO | 9 | 26 | 1 (0.56–1.79) | 1.00 | 32 | 0.9 (0.54–1.44) | 0.62 | |
| Blend F | 9 | 36 | 1.5 (0.91–2.61) | 0.18 | 78 | 2.3(1.55–3.47) | <0.001 | |
| LO+Blend F | 9 | 11 | 0.4 (0.17–0.82) | <0.05 | 36 | 1.1 (0.66–1.70) | 0.81 | |
| LO+Socks | 9 | 28 | 1.2 (0.67–2.06) | 0.57 | 33 | 1 (0.60–1.57) | 0.90 | |
IRR = incidence rate ratio, CI = confidence interval, N = number of replicates, n = total number of mosquitoes caught, LO = (E)-linalool oxide and OC = β-ocimene. Worn socks were used as reference.