Table 1.
Summary of the decoding performance results for each of the categorical comparison, voice-animal and living-manmade and each recording during TH and NT.
No. of significant patients | Decoding value (s.e.m.) | Chance level (s.e.m.) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TH | NT | TH | NT | TH | NT | |
Voice—animal | 7 | 7 | 0.63 (0.03) | 0.65 (0.05) | 0.53 (0.01) | 0.49 (0.07) |
Living-manmade | 5 | 6 | 0.60 (0.02) | 0.63 (0.05) | 0.54 (0.03) | 0.57 (0.05) |
The total number of patients exhibiting significant results is shown. Some of these patients had significant results both during TH and during NT (four for the Voice-Animal comparison, and one for the Living-Manmade one). The mean decoding value and the chance level (standard error in parentheses) are computed across the significant results only.