Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 25;5:155. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00155

Table 1.

Summary of the decoding performance results for each of the categorical comparison, voice-animal and living-manmade and each recording during TH and NT.

No. of significant patients Decoding value (s.e.m.) Chance level (s.e.m.)
TH NT TH NT TH NT
Voice—animal 7 7 0.63 (0.03) 0.65 (0.05) 0.53 (0.01) 0.49 (0.07)
Living-manmade 5 6 0.60 (0.02) 0.63 (0.05) 0.54 (0.03) 0.57 (0.05)

The total number of patients exhibiting significant results is shown. Some of these patients had significant results both during TH and during NT (four for the Voice-Animal comparison, and one for the Living-Manmade one). The mean decoding value and the chance level (standard error in parentheses) are computed across the significant results only.