Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Care. 2014 Mar;52(0 3):S132–S139. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182a53ca8

Table 3. Hazard ratios of death and composite endpoint for mid (34.5 to <39.0%) versus low (30.0 to <34.5%) hematocrit target treatment strategies, USRDS 2006-2008.

Intention-to-treat analysis* All patients Patients with Hct >30% at baseline
Patient months Events HR 95% CI Patient months Events HR 95% CI
Death only
Low Hct 79,240 2,292 1 (ref.) 68,225 1,808 1 (ref.)
Mid Hct 86,828 2,738 1.05 0.99 1.11 79,258 2,295 1.07 1.01 1.14
Composite
Low Hct 74,809 3,281 1 (ref.) 64,484 2,662 1 (ref.)
Mid Hct 84,311 3,825 1.03 0.98 1.08 74,721 3,244 1.04 0.99 1.09

Per-protocol analysis
Death only
Low Hct 17,849 683 1 (ref.) 15,311 529 1 (ref.)
Mid Hct 29,811 1,044 0.98 0.78 1.24 26,998 904 1.02 0.79 1.32
Composite
Low Hct 17,295 948 1 (ref.) 14,857 763 1 (ref.)
Mid Hct 28,556 1,484 1.00 0.81 1.24 25,893 1,285 1.01 0.81 1.26

USRDS: United States Renal Data System, Hct: hematocrit, HR: hazard ratio, CI: confidence interval.

Composite outcome is death or hospitalization for MI, stroke, or congestive heart failure

*

Adjusted for baseline variables including age at ESRD onset, race, gender, US geographic region, dialysis chain membership, predialysis epoetin use and hematocrit level, baseline hematocrit level, epoetin dose, and iron dose, baseline patient BMI, diabetes status, Charlson Index score, cardiovascular comorbidities, tobacco use, drug/alcohol dependence, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and other severe conditions including amputation, inability to ambulate, and inability to transfer.

Further adjusted (via inverse-probability weighting) for time-varying variables including hematocrit value, change in hematocrit, hospitalization, epoetin withhold, epoetin dose, and iron dose.