Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 24;64(620):e137–e143. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X677509

Table 3.

Independent effects on likelihood of patient receiving a ‘may be fit’ note

Model A (Null) Model B
Model C
MODEL D
OR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value
Level 1: Patient

Category of health problem
  Respiratory problem 1.00 1.00 1.00
  Mental health problem 1.86 (1.50 to 2.32) <0.001 1.82 (1.38 to 2.44) <0.001 1.80 (1.39 to 2.44) <0.001
  Musculoskeletal 3.27 (2.60 to 4.10) <0.001 3.19 (2.56 to 4.16) <0.001 3.17 (2.38 to 4.36) <0.001
  Injury 4.29 (3.38 to 5.43) <0.001 4.19 (3.29 to 5.54) <0.001 4.17 (3.10 to 5.71) <0.001
  Circulatory illness 3.58 (2.63 to 4.88) <0.001 3.50 (2.55 to 5.02) <0.001 3.45 (2.40 to 5.09) <0.001
  Post-operative recovery 3.30 (2.61 to 4.17) <0.001 3.19 (2.53 to 4.30) <0.001 3.15 (2.37 to 4.48) <0.001
  Other 2.20 (1.77 to 2.74) <0.001 2.11 (1.67 to 2.85) <0.001 2.04 (1.45 to 2.94) <0.001

Female patient 1.11 (1.02 to 1.22) 0.020 1.10 (1.01 to 1.20) 0.030 1.09 (1.01 to 1.21) 0.032

Age (10 years older) 1.01 (0.98 to 1.02) 0.910 1.05 (0.93 to 1.08) 0.880 1.05 (0.92 to 1.09) 0.890

Living in one of 20% most deprived neighbourhoods in the country 0.83 (0.72 to 0.94) 0.006 0.85 (0.75 to 0.93) 0.005 0.86 (0.73 to 0.94) 0.011

Level 2: Certifying GP

Female GP 1.01 (0.88 to 1.15) 0.830 1.01 (0.80 to 1.24) 0.890

Age, years
  <35 1.00 1.00
  35–50 0.96 (0.81 to 1.14) 0.630 0.97 (0.81 to 1.15) 0.720
  >50 0.92 (0.76 to 1.13) 0.440 0.93 (0.76 to 1.14) 0.490

Partner in practice 0.92 (0.79 to 1.07) 0.290 0.91 (0.78 to 1.07) 0.250

Works full-time 0.90 (0.78 to 1.03) 0.130 0.94 (0.74 to 1.08) 0.140

Level 3: Practice

List size, patients
  <5000 1.00
  5000–10 000 1.24 (0.82 to 1.85) 0.300
>10 000 1.23 (0.78 to 1.95) 0.380

Urban (versus rural) practice area 0.88 (0.61 to 1.27) 0.510

Practice ‘very deprived’ 0.76 (0.50 to 1.15) 0.200

Random effects

Model Variance 0.42 0.37 0.36 0.34

Median OR 1.85 1.78 1.77 1.74

Values in bold denote statistically significant effects.