Table 3.

Top five templates before and after re-ranking for targets 2y0mB(top) and 3rjpA(bottom)

R	Temp	ID	cSA	cRD	aSS	Z	MSp	MSr	R′
1	1undA	0.09	0.56	0.10	0.85	−14.1	0.43	0.30	4
2	2kesA	0.15	−0.03	0.07	0.97	−13.9	0.79	0.60	2
3	2rmfA	0.25	0.21	−0.03	1.00	−13.9	0.62	0.58	3
4	2o98P	0.31	0.08	0.26	0.96	−13.3	0.81	0.55	1
5	3a1qC	0.11	0.21	−0.01	0.94	−13.0	0.42	0.67	5
1	2jzyA	0.38	0.44	0.35	0.78	−84.1	0.69	0.59	2
2	2pmuA	0.35	0.65	0.55	0.87	−80.8	0.75	0.79	1
3	2hqnA	0.27	0.50	0.44	0.81	−75.2	0.70	0.66	4
4	1gxpA	0.37	0.58	0.55	0.84	−71.4	0.75	0.80	3
5	1ys6A	0.41	0.58	0.60	0.90	−69.2	0.73	0.76	5

R, order before re-ranking; Temp, template name; ID, sequence identity in the alignment region; cSA, correlation coefficient of solvent accessibility in the alignment region; cRD, correlation coefficient of residue depth in the alignment region; aSS, agreement of secondary structure in the alignment region; Z, original Z-score; MSp, predicted MaxSub score; MSr, real MaxSub score of the alignment; R′, order after re-ranking.