Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 25.
Published in final edited form as: Stroke. 2013 Apr 18;44(6):1754–1760. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.000734

Table 1.

Lost in Translation—Some Potential Reasons Why Clinical Stroke Trials Were Unable to Replicate Bench Findings

Complexity of ischemic pathophysiology underestimated
Low quality of preclinical studies, underpowered, effect sizes overestimated, results not robust (low internal validity)
Stroke models do not match with patient characteristics (age, sex, comorbidities, polypharmacology; low external validity)
Negative publication bias (particularly in preclinical research)
Heterogeneity of stroke patients, therapies not matched to individual pathophysiology
Super systemic effects (on immune, cardiovascular system, etc) attributable to a substantial fraction of stroke morbidity and mortality, but little understood and
under-researched
Timing of therapy wrong or clinically irrelevant, clinical trial design not matched to preclinical findings
Significant species differences