Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Immunol. 2013 Dec 23;192(3):929–939. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302171

Table I.

Influence of μMT genotype on susceptibility of C3HeB/Fej and C3H.SW mice to EAE

Induction Method Strain Genotype Incidence Mean day of onseta Mean maximum scorea Recovery
Active C3H/Fej WT 88% (7/8) 18 ± 5 5.0 ± 0.3 0/7
Active C3H/Fej μMT 33% (5/15)b 21 ± 4 4.9 ± 0.5 0/5
Active C3H.SW WT 100% (6/6) 14 ± 1 3.1 ± 0.1 3/6
Active C3H.SW μMT 50% (5/10)c 15 ± 4 3.6 ± 0.2 3/5
Passive C3H/Fej WT 96% (29/30) 6.7 ± 0.9 4.6 ± 1.3 0/29
Passive C3H/Fej μMT 21% (6/28)d 6.6 ± 0.5 4.3 ± 1.9 0/6
a

Data shown (mean ± SEM) are from mice with EAE. p values indicating significant differences between WT vs μMT mice are as follows:

b

p=0.01,

c

p=0.03,

d

p<0.0001, Chi-squared test.