Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 14;17(5):427–434. doi: 10.5114/wo.2013.38565

Table 5.

Effect of geographic origin of the study on the effect size in maximum likelihood meta-regression

Study-level covariates Geographic Origin of Study No. of studies (homogeneity p-value)** Effect size* Difference in effect size estimates

Point estimate 95% CI Difference in point estimates 95% CI
Other Asia 3 (p = 0.237) 0.631 0.173–0.933 1.000 0.321–0.604
Europe 5 (p = 0.027) 0.411 0.127–0.770 0.3091 –0.088–0.707
North America 7 (p = 0.339) 0.517 0.297–0.730 0.1482 –0.273–0.569
Meta-Regression for all areas Slope: 0.409 (95% CI: –0.167–0.987) p = 0.164; Intercept: –1.373 (95% CI –2.944–0.196) p = 0.086
*

Random effects model

**

Cochran's Q

1

p = 0.139

2

p = 0.510

Slope; effect parameter (= regression coefficient β1), Intercept (= coefficient β0)