Table 5.
Effect of geographic origin of the study on the effect size in maximum likelihood meta-regression
| Study-level covariates Geographic Origin of Study | No. of studies (homogeneity p-value)** | Effect size* | Difference in effect size estimates | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||
| Point estimate | 95% CI | Difference in point estimates | 95% CI | ||
| Other Asia | 3 (p = 0.237) | 0.631 | 0.173–0.933 | 1.000 | 0.321–0.604 |
| Europe | 5 (p = 0.027) | 0.411 | 0.127–0.770 | 0.3091 | –0.088–0.707 |
| North America | 7 (p = 0.339) | 0.517 | 0.297–0.730 | 0.1482 | –0.273–0.569 |
| Meta-Regression for all areas | Slope: 0.409 (95% CI: –0.167–0.987) p = 0.164; Intercept: –1.373 (95% CI –2.944–0.196) p = 0.086 | ||||
Random effects model
Cochran's Q
p = 0.139
p = 0.510
Slope; effect parameter (= regression coefficient β1), Intercept (= coefficient β0)