Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 25.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychopathol. 2013 Aug;25(3):739–754. doi: 10.1017/S095457941300014X

Table 2.

Comparison of prospective univariate antisocial personality models

Model
Variable FM FM Shift FCSI MANOVA τ Equiv.
Slope Factor Loadings (λ)

Age 18 1.29*** 1.22*** 0.69*** 0 0
Age 21 1.11*** 1.12*** 0.12 −0.38*** 0
Age 26 1.02*** 1.09*** −0.21 −0.45*** 0

Factor Means (θ)

Intercept 0 −2.50 1.58*** 1.95*** 1.67***
Slope 1.48*** 3.64 0.51*** 1 0

Covariance Between Intercept and Slope Factors (φI,S)

Covariance 0 0 0 0 0

Variances (φ and εi)

Intercept 0 0 1.35*** 1.34*** 1.32***
Slope 1 1 1 0 0
E1 1.06*** 1.06*** 0.73*** 1.18*** 1.24***
E2 1.45*** 1.43*** 1.49*** 1.18*** 1.24***
E3 1.06*** 1.06*** 0.73*** 1.18*** 1.24***

Selected Fit Measures

χ2 (df) 11.86 (3) 8.09 (2) 3.71 (1) 15.72 (4) 58.33 (6)
TLI 0.97 0.97 0.98 0.97 0.92
CFI 0.97 0.98 0.99 0.97 0.85
RMSEA 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.14
90% CI 0.03–0.13 0.03–0.15 0.00–0.17 0.04–0.13 0.11–0.17

Note: Corresponding intercept factor loadings are fixed to unity. FM, factor mean; FCSI, free curve slope intercept; MANOVA, multivariate analysis of variance; E1, Estimate 1; E2, Estimate 2; E3, Estimate 3; TLI, Tucker–Lewis index; CFI, comparative fit index; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation; CI, confidence interval.

***

p < .001.