Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 28;20(8):2014–2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i8.2014

Table 2.

Computed tomographic colonography accuracy for colonic surveillance after colorectal cancer resection

Patients
Sensitivity
Specificity
n Characteristics Target lesions1 Per-patient Per-lesion
Amitai et al[64] 29 Routine surveillance (Peri) anastomotic recurrence 100% (2/2) 100% (2/2) NA
Metachronous polyps 100% (NA) 93% (28/30) 71% (NA)
Fletcher et al[65] 50 Routine surveillance (Peri) anastomotic recurrence 100% (2/2) NA 94% (45/48)
Metachronous polyps ≥ 5 mm 60% (3/5) NA 84% (38/45)
You et al[67] 80 Suspicion of recurrence (Peri) anastomotic recurrence 100% (51/51) 100% (51/51) 83% (24/29)
Kim et al[68] 548 Routine surveillance Metachronous cancer and (peri) anastomotic recurrence 100% (6/6) 100% (7/7) 93.1% (421/452)
Advanced neoplasia2 81.8% (18/22) 80.8% (21/26)
All adenomatous lesions3 ≥ 6 mm 80% (52/65) 78.5% (62/79)

Data are percentages with the actual numbers of patients and lesions are presented in parentheses.

1

Histology and size are not specified unless provided in the original studies;

2

Advanced neoplasia includes both advanced adenomas (≥ 10 mm in size or with a substantial villous component or high-grade dysplasia) and adenocarcinomas;

3

Both adenomas and adenocarcinomas are included. NA: Not available.