Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 14;592(Pt 4):669–693. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.267872

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A, typical examples showing the mAHP under control (black) and 100 nm scyllatoxin application (red). The overlay shows the mAHP effectively blocked after toxin application. B, the mAHP was enhanced by 500 μm 1-EBIO application. Both the mAHP amplitude and duration were increased after 1-EBIO application (red) compared to control traces (black). Note the increased positive current step injected to evoke a train of seven APs after 1-EBIO application. C, time course showing the effect of 100 nm scyllatoxin application during the recording time (n = 5, left panel). Summary graph of the five cells tested with this toxin (right panel) showing the comparison between control period (1) and values with full effect (2), measured in the time plot (n = 5, P < 0.01 (**)). D, similar analysis of the data in B, showing enhancement of the mAHP after 1-EBIO application (n = 5, P < 0.001 (***)).