Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 3;592(Pt 4):745–757. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.260331

Table 1.

Mean, standard deviation and repeated measures GLM of N1, P2 and N60, P150 peak latencies and amplitudes of standard ERP from aMMN and sMMN

Anodal pre Anodal post Cathodal pre Cathodal post Sham pre Sham post Stimulation Timing Interaction
N60 amplitude −4.1 ± 1.4 −4.2 ± 1.2 −4.4 ± 1.3 −4.5 ± 1.2 −4.2 ± 1.0 −3.7 ± 1.4 F(2,18) = 0.90 P = 0.42 F(1,9) = 0.15 P = 0.71 F(2,18) = 0.83, P = 0.45
P150 amplitude 2.5 ± 0.9 2.6 ± 1.4 2.5 ± 0.9 2.5 ± 0.8 2.6 ± 1.2 2.7 ± 1.7 F(2,18) = 0.15 P = 0.87 F(1,9) = 0.19 P = 0.67 F(2,18) = 0.10, P = 0.90
N60 latency 63 ± 11 58 ± 8 60 ± 7 60 ± 9 59 ± 6 57 ± 5 F(2,18) = 0.43 P = 0.66 F(1,9) = 2.53 P = 0.15 F(2,18) = 1.01, P = 0.38
P150 latency 152.2 ± 45.7 145.2 ± 51.5 156.7 ± 58.9 150.5 ± 65.2 149.6 ± 47.0 146.2 ± 36.0 F(2,18) = 0.09 P = 0.91 F(1,9) = 0.39 P = 0.55 F(2,18) = 0.02, P = 0.98
N1 amplitude −0.7 ± 0.4 −0.7 ± 0.5 −0.6 ± 0.4 −0.7 ± 0.6 −0.8 ± 0.5 −0.8 ± 0.5 F(2,18) = 0.56 P = 0.58 F(1,9) = 0.00 P = 0.96 F(2,18) = 0.03, P = 0.97
P2 amplitude 0.7 ± 0.2 0.7 ± 0.2 0.9 ± 0.4 0.8 ± 0.6 0.7 ± 0.3 0.8 ± 0.6 F(2,18) = 0.58 P = 0.57 F(1,9) = 0.25 P = 0.63 F(2,18) = 0.21, P = 0.82
N1 latency 107.5 ± 14.1 106.1 ± 12.9 110.9 ± 22.8 107.3 ± 20.7 105.5 ± 13.7 106.6 ± 13.8 F(2,18) = 0.16 P = 0.85 F(1,9) = 0.14 P = 0.71 F(2,18) = 0.12, P = 0.89
P2 latency 165 ± 20 165 ± 14 173 ± 19 160 ± 18 168 ± 13 169 ± 19 F(2,18) = 0.33 P = 0.73 F(1,9) = 1.36 P = 0.27 F(2,18) = 2.26, P = 0.13

Before and after sham, anodal and cathodal stimulation were acquired at C3 in sMMN and Fz in aMMN. No significant differences between stimulation condition and timing were observed (cf. Results).

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure