Table 1.
Mean, standard deviation and repeated measures GLM of N1, P2 and N60, P150 peak latencies and amplitudes of standard ERP from aMMN and sMMN
Anodal pre | Anodal post | Cathodal pre | Cathodal post | Sham pre | Sham post | Stimulation | Timing | Interaction | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N60 amplitude | −4.1 ± 1.4 | −4.2 ± 1.2 | −4.4 ± 1.3 | −4.5 ± 1.2 | −4.2 ± 1.0 | −3.7 ± 1.4 | F(2,18) = 0.90 P = 0.42 | F(1,9) = 0.15 P = 0.71 | F(2,18) = 0.83, P = 0.45 |
P150 amplitude | 2.5 ± 0.9 | 2.6 ± 1.4 | 2.5 ± 0.9 | 2.5 ± 0.8 | 2.6 ± 1.2 | 2.7 ± 1.7 | F(2,18) = 0.15 P = 0.87 | F(1,9) = 0.19 P = 0.67 | F(2,18) = 0.10, P = 0.90 |
N60 latency | 63 ± 11 | 58 ± 8 | 60 ± 7 | 60 ± 9 | 59 ± 6 | 57 ± 5 | F(2,18) = 0.43 P = 0.66 | F(1,9) = 2.53 P = 0.15 | F(2,18) = 1.01, P = 0.38 |
P150 latency | 152.2 ± 45.7 | 145.2 ± 51.5 | 156.7 ± 58.9 | 150.5 ± 65.2 | 149.6 ± 47.0 | 146.2 ± 36.0 | F(2,18) = 0.09 P = 0.91 | F(1,9) = 0.39 P = 0.55 | F(2,18) = 0.02, P = 0.98 |
N1 amplitude | −0.7 ± 0.4 | −0.7 ± 0.5 | −0.6 ± 0.4 | −0.7 ± 0.6 | −0.8 ± 0.5 | −0.8 ± 0.5 | F(2,18) = 0.56 P = 0.58 | F(1,9) = 0.00 P = 0.96 | F(2,18) = 0.03, P = 0.97 |
P2 amplitude | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.4 | 0.8 ± 0.6 | 0.7 ± 0.3 | 0.8 ± 0.6 | F(2,18) = 0.58 P = 0.57 | F(1,9) = 0.25 P = 0.63 | F(2,18) = 0.21, P = 0.82 |
N1 latency | 107.5 ± 14.1 | 106.1 ± 12.9 | 110.9 ± 22.8 | 107.3 ± 20.7 | 105.5 ± 13.7 | 106.6 ± 13.8 | F(2,18) = 0.16 P = 0.85 | F(1,9) = 0.14 P = 0.71 | F(2,18) = 0.12, P = 0.89 |
P2 latency | 165 ± 20 | 165 ± 14 | 173 ± 19 | 160 ± 18 | 168 ± 13 | 169 ± 19 | F(2,18) = 0.33 P = 0.73 | F(1,9) = 1.36 P = 0.27 | F(2,18) = 2.26, P = 0.13 |
Before and after sham, anodal and cathodal stimulation were acquired at C3 in sMMN and Fz in aMMN. No significant differences between stimulation condition and timing were observed (cf. Results).