Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 25;8(1):61–69. doi: 10.1007/s11832-014-0552-9

Table 1.

Surgical demographics and radiographic measures for each case included in the study

Patient REF# Gender Limb # Side MD Surg year Surg Age (yrs) Office Fw-up (yrs) Pre-Op angle (°) Last Visit Angle (°) STR PF DF PT PN Other procedures Complications Subsequent surgery
1 F 1 L DSW 2009 16.4 2.4 38 27 Y N N Y Y
2 F 2 R DSW 2009 14.7 3.8 27 19 Y N N Y Y Patellar tendon repair’12
3 L DSW 2009 14.7 3.7 41 20 Y N N Y Y
3 F 4 R DSW 2009 10.2 3.6 24 5 Y N N Y Y HS + patellar tendon lengthening ROH’10
5 L DSW 2009 10.2 3.6 35 50 Y N N Y Y HS + patellar tendon lengthening ROH’10; anticipated revision (by DSW)
4 F 6 R DSW 2010 25.7 1.9 34 13 Y N N Y Y Tubercle osteotomy Delayed union
5 F 7 R DSW 2010 14.7 0.8 17 8 Y N N Y Y Tubercle osteotomy
8 L DSW 2011 15.2 0.3 63 20 Y N N Y Y Tubercle osteotomy
6 M 9 R DSW 2009 15.2 0.7 28 12 Y N N Y Y Pseudoarthrosis ROH + resection’09
10 L DSW 2009 15.5 0.4 * 20 Y N N Y Y
7 F 11 R DSW 2009 13.9 0.2 27 10 Y N N Y Y
12 L DSW 2008 13.0 1.2 26 12 Y N N Y Y
8 F 13 R SK 1982 11.3 18.0 35 7 Y N Y N Y Patellar reconstruction Knee contracture; peroneal n. palsy

ROH + lysis’83, knee manip’83

revision DF’’84; tendon transfer’86

9 M 14 R SK 1986 15.3 9.9 12 15 Y Y Y Y Y Knee contracture

Knee manip + fx’87, ROH’87

DF osteotomy’89, ROH’90

15 L SK 1986 15.3 9.9 25 7 Y Y Y Y Y Knee contracture Knee manip + fx’87, ROH’90
10 M 16 R SK 1998 16.1 9.7 28 0 Y Y Y Y Y IT + gluteus mobilized ROH’00
17 L SK 1998 16.1 9.7 29 7 Y Y Y Y Y IT + gluteus mobilized ROH’00
11 M 18 R SK 2000 17.7 7.9 40 14 Y Y Y Y Y IT + gluteus mobilized
19 L SK 2000 17.7 7.9 35 22 Y Y Y Y Y IT + gluteus mobilized
12 M 20 R SK 1998 7.2 12.1 64 25 Y Y Y Y Y

fx-ORIF-ROH’05

revision’09 (by DSW)

20Rv R DSW 2009 18.3 1.0 25 14 Y N N Y Y
21 L SK 1998 7.2 12.1 65 20 Y Y Y Y Y Revision’10 (by DSW)
21Rv L DSW 2010 19.1 0.2 20 8 Y N N Y Y ROH Skin breakdown from hematoma I&D, skin graft’10; ROH’10
13 F 22 R SK 1992 13.3 2.0 41 10 Y Y Y Y Y TFL resection + HS lengthening Knee contracture Knee manip’92; ROH’94
23 L SK 1992 13.3 2.0 45 7 Y Y Y Y Y TFL resection + HS lengthening Knee contracture Knee manip’92; ROH’94

REF reference, MD surgeon, surg surgical, yrs = years, Fw-up follow-up, STR soft tissue release, PF tri-planar proximal femoral osteotomy, DF distal femoral osteotomy, PT proximal tibial osteotomy, PN peroneal nerve mobilization, HS hamstring, pre-op pre-operative, post-op post-operative, deg degrees, Rv revision, F female, M male, L left, R right, DSW Dennis S. Weiner, M.D., SK Steven Kopits, M.D., Y yes, N no, ROH removal of hardware, TFL tibial femoral ligament, n. nerve, manip manipulation, fx fracture, I&D incision and drain, ORIF open reduction internal fixation, IT iliotibial band

# Number

* Image not available