Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 26;4:4201. doi: 10.1038/srep04201

Figure 4. Comparison of the deactivation kinetics of hERG and the S1–S6 chimaera.

Figure 4

(a) Voltage protocol used to measure deactivation kinetics. (b) Representative deactivation current traces of hERG and the S1–S6 chimaera at various voltage potentials following the +40 mV pulse. (c–d) Comparison of the voltage dependence of fast (b) and slow (c) deactivation time constants calculated from deactivation current traces, as described in methods (chimaera, n = 8; hERG, n = 5). The fast deactivation kinetics of the S1–S6 chimaera are significantly faster than those for hERG (p < 0.05). (e) Normalised current-voltage relationships of peak fully activated currents (n = 7). Erev values were calculated by fitting the linear section of the curve and calculating the x-intercept (not shown). Erev values were ≈−90 mV.