Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 26.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Appl Stat. 2013 Dec 23;7(4):2062–2080. doi: 10.1214/13-AOAS665

Table 5.

Sensitivity of the estimated bladder cancer treatment cost ratio to an unmeasured Gamma confounder

Mean0/Mean1 Var/Meanp Effect of confounder Cost ratio 95% CI
1.1 2 1.05 0.88 (0.80, 0.97)
1.25 2 1.05 0.89 (0.81, 0.98)
1.5 2 1.05 0.91 (0.83, 1.01)
1.1 3 1.05 0.89 (0.81, 0.98)
1.25 3 1.05 0.91 (0.82, 1.00)
1.5 3 1.05 0.94 (0.85, 1.03)
1.1 2 1.1 0.89 (0.81, 0.98)
1.25 2 1.1 0.92 (0.83, 1.01)
1.5 2 1.1 0.96 (0.87, 1.06)
1.1 3 1.1 0.90 (0.82, 0.99)
1.25 3 1.1 0.95 (0.86, 1.04)
1.5 3 1.1 1.02 (0.92, 1.12)

Unadjusted cost ratio = 0.87 (95% CI 0.79–0.96).

Boldface confidence intervals denote changes from the unadjusted inference.

Mean0 = mean of unmeasured confounder in cystectomy group.

Mean1 = mean of unmeasured confounder in rad/chemo group.

Meanp = mean pooled across both groups.