Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb;104(2):e154–e161. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301571

TABLE 1—

Descriptive Statistics for 1865 Youths in the 9-, 12-, and 15-Year-Old Cohorts of the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods, 1995 and 1999

Variables Full Sample Low Disadvantage (n = 496), % or mean (SD) Moderate Disadvantage (n = 909), % or mean (SD) High Disadvantage (n = 404), % or mean (SD) χ2 or F-value
Violent victimization 30 29 28 32 2.53
Male 50 50 50 51 0.04
Age, y 11.97 (2.42) 12.13 (2.48) 11.97 (2.41) 11.79 (2.38) 2.20
Race/ethnicity
 White 15 39 9 2 352.09***
 African American 34 6 29 76 548.35***
 Hispanic 47 49 60 20 198.08***
 Other 4 6 3 3 7.67*
Family and parenting factors
 Family SES -0.10 (1.42) 0.51 (1.45) -0.37 (1.40) -0.22 (1.24)ab 65.57***
 Family attachment 0.01 (0.97) 0.08 (0.87) -0.03 (1.03) 0.01 (0.95) 2.12
 Parental warmth 0.03 (0.95) 0.06 (0.91) 0.04 (0.98) -0.03 (0.92) 1.17
 Parental supervision 0.03 (0.96) -0.15 (1.07) 0.09 (0.94)c 0.10 (0.86)ab 11.89***
Low self-control -0.01 (0.98) -0.05 (0.97) -0.05 (1.01) 0.12 (0.91)ab 4.92**
Behavioral and lifestyle factors
 Delinquent peers -0.02 (0.97) -0.26 (0.83) 0.01 (0.99)c 0.17 (1.02)ab 24.68***
 Previous violence 33 29 31 42 24.72***
 Unstructured time 0.01 (2.66) 0.24 (2.58) -0.11 (2.67)c -0.00 (2.74) 2.90
Street efficacy 0.00 (1.00) 0.31 (0.96) -0.13 (0.99)c -0.07 (0.99)a 33.08***

Note. SES = socioeconomic status. Percentages are reported for binary variables; χ2 values are reported for binary measures and F-values for composite scales. We standardized each composite measure to have a mean of 0 indicating the average score for the full analysis sample (individual scores above the mean indicate that a participant scored higher than the mean on a particular variable). Additional correlation analyses for categorical measures showed that African Americans, Hispanics, and those reporting greater participation in violence were significantly more likely to reside in high-disadvantage neighborhoods.

a

(Bonferroni post hoc test) = high disadvantage significantly different from low disadvantage (P < .05).

b

(Bonferroni post hoc test) = high disadvantage significantly different from moderate disadvantage (P < .05).

c

(Bonferroni post hoc test) = moderate disadvantage significantly different from low disadvantage (P < .05).