TABLE 3—

Unstandardized Model Parameter Estimates for MSW, MSMW, and MSM From 11 Jurisdictions That Measured Gender of Sexual Partners: Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System, United States, 2005 and 2007

		MSW			MSMW			MSM
Parameters	Path	ba (95% CI)	SE	R2	ba (95% CI)	SE	R2	ba (95% CI)	SE	R2
Felt sad	a	0.48 (0.38, 0.60)	0.06	0.07	0.52 (0.18, 0.85)	0.17	0.13	0.23c (−0.33, 0.80)	0.29	0.03
Binge drinking	b	1.51 (1.21, 1.82)	0.16	0.44	1.76 (0.65, 2.87)	0.57	0.63	0.96 (0.12, 1.81)	0.43	0.31
Marijuana use	c	1.80 (1.36, 2.25)	0.23	0.52	2.58 (0.85, 4.31)	0.88	0.78	0.96 (0.09, 1.82)	0.44	0.31
Cocaine use	d	4.01 (2.16, 5.87)	0.95	0.85	3.41 (0.29, 6.20)	1.43	0.86	2.29c (−0.30, 4.87)	1.32	0.72
Risky sex	e	1.35 (1.09, 1.62)	0.14	0.38	1.48 (0.29, 2.66)	0.60	0.54	0.65 (0.24, 1.06)	0.21	0.17
Intimate partner violence	f	0.68 (0.53, 0.84)	0.08	0.14	2.01 (1.15, 2.88)	0.44	0.69	0.84 (0.10, 1.59)	0.28	0.26
Threatened with a weapon	g	0.58 (0.43, 0.74)	0.08	…	0.58 (0.03, 1.13)	0.28	…	1.25 (0.48, 2.02)	0.29	…
Had something stolen	h	0.23 (0.11, 0.35)	0.06	…	0.22c (−0.20, 0.64)	0.21	…	0.82 (0.15, 1.48)	0.34	…
Forced to have sex	i	0.90 (0.69, 1.11)	0.11	…	1.44 (0.87, 2.01)	0.29	…	0.90c (−0.18, 1.99)	0.55	…
Suicide attempt	j	3.47b (2.50, 4.83)	0.17	0.34	5.08b (2.14, 12.28)	0.45	0.59	5.75b (1.36, 24.39)	0.74	0.60
Syndemic latent factor	…	…	…	0.10	…	…	0.44	…	…	0.38

Note. CI = confidence interval; MSM = men who have sex with men; MSMW = men who have sex with men and women; MSW = men who have sex with women. We performed structural equation modeling in Mplus with a model that accounted for the complex sampling design. Unless otherwise indicated, parameter estimates are significant at P < .05. The 11 jurisdictions were Boston, MA; Chicago, IL; Delaware; Maine; Massachusetts; New York City, NY; San Diego, CA; Vermont; Rhode Island; Wisconsin; and Milwaukee, WI.

^aUnless otherwise indicated, estimates are presented as unstandardized b coefficients.

^bOdds ratio.

^cNonsignificant estimate.