Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 26;9(2):e89955. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089955

Figure 1. Number of reviews, comparative analyses and meta-analyses referenced on the Web of Science in ecology, evolution and conservation between 1995 and 2012 in birds, mammals and herptiles (amphibians and reptiles).

Figure 1

The three slopes are significantly different from 0 (p<0.006 in the 3 cases), and the increase in the number of review papers across time is significantly smaller in amphibians and reptiles than it is in birds (p = 0.009) or mammals (p<0.001), but does not significantly differ between birds and mammals (p = 0.332).