Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 26.
Published in final edited form as: Proteins. 2010 Nov 15;78(15):3104–3110. doi: 10.1002/prot.22764

Table 1.

Summary of ZDOCK and ZRANK performance for CARPI Rounds 13-19

Prediction (ZDOCK) Scoring (ZRANK)

Target Complex Typea Classificationb fnat c iRMSD c Classificationb fnat c iRMSD c
29 TRM8 / TRM82 U/B Acceptable 49 2.131 Medium 69 1.120
30 Rnd1 / Plexin-B1 U/U Incorrect 16 4.849 Incorrect 0 10.039
32 BASI / Subtilisin U/U Incorrect 25 5.505 Incorrect 1 9.453
33 Methyl transferase
/ RNA
H/H Incorrect 10 16.212 Incorrect 1 19.537
34 Methyl transferase
/ RNA
H/B Incorrect 27 4.997 Not
participated
35 CBM22-1 / GH10 H/H Incorrect 7 4.606 Incorrect 4 8.716
36 CBM22-1 / GH10 B/H Acceptable 37 3.649 Not
participated
37 LZ2 / ARF6 H/U High 59 0.988 High 92 0.939
39 Centaurin-α1 /
KIF13B FHA
U/B Incorrect 0 15.639 Incorrect 0 15.643
40 Bovine Trypsin /
APIA
U/U Mediumd 92 1.007 Highd 86 0.433
Highd 95 0.636 Incorrectd 0 19.879
41 Colicin E9 / IM2 U/U Medium 46 1.728 Acceptable 63 2.45
42 TPR H/H Mediumd 100 1.199 N/A
Incorrectd 15 4.135 N/A
a

U, B, and H denote unbound, bound, and homology modeling input structures, respectively.

b

Best classification of our 10 predictions, as assessed by the CAPRI evaluation team.

c

fnat (%) and interface RMSD (iRMSD, Å) provided by the CAPRI evaluation team. In case of multiple predictions of the same classification, we report the prediction with the lowest interface RMSD.

d

Results are reported for the two distinct binding modes for targets 40 and 42.