Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 29.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2014 Jan 15;136(4):1260–1263. doi: 10.1021/ja4115314

Table 1.

Comparison of Kinetic and Thermodynamic Parameters for O2 binding and dissociation for [(L)Cu]+ adducts.

TMG3trenc
kO2 kO2 KO2
ΔH or ΔH0 a 10 ± 6 45 ± 7 −40 ± 2
ΔS or ΔS0 b −70 ± 26 42 ± 34 −134 ± 11
k or K 25°C (2.7 ± 1.2) · 107 (1.5 ± 0.8) · 107 ≈ 1
k or K −80°C (2.1 ± 1.0) · 106 (5.2 ± 2.0) · 102 (6.3 ± 1.9) · 103
PV-TMPAc
kO2 kO2 KO2
ΔH or ΔH0 a 9 ± 1 - -
ΔS or ΔS0 b −97 ± 7 - -
k or K 25°C (4.8 ± 2.8) · 107 - -
k or K −80°C (6.6 ± 3.5) · 105 - -
TMPAd
kO2 kO2 KO2
ΔH or ΔH0 a 7.62 58.0 −48.5
ΔS or ΔS0 b −45.1 105 −140
k or K 25°C 1.3 · 109 1.3 · 108 15.4
k or K −80°C 1.4–1.6 · 108 240 6.5 · 105
a

ΔH, kJ mol−1

b

ΔS, J K−1 mol−1

c

In MeTHF, this work

d

In THF, determined through flash-and-trap method.13 Values for [(TMPA)-Cu] in MeTHF have been found to be the same as in THF within experimental errors.