Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Jul 31;62(5):457–465. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.05.003

Table 2.

Validity and reliability data of DTS and bCAM in older emergency department patients.

TP FN TN FP Sensitivity (95%CI) Specificity (95%CI) PLR (95%CI) NLR (95%CI)
DTS Physician 49 1 195 161 98.0% (89.5% – 99.5%) 54.8% (49.6% – 59.9%) 2.17 (1.92 – 2.45) 0.04 (0.01 – 0.25)
RA 49 1 200 156 98.0% (89.5% – 99.5%) 56.2% (51.0% – 61.3%) 2.24 (1.98 – 2.53) 0.04 (0.01 – 0.25)
% Concordance between Physician and RA = 89.4% (95%CI: 86.0% – 92.0%)
Kappa = 0.79 (95%CI: 0.73 – 0.85)
bCAM Physician 42 8 341 15 84.0% (71.5% – 91.7%) 95.8% (93.2% – 97.4%) 19.94 (11.97 – 33.19) 0.17 (0.09 – 0.32)
RA 39 11 345 11 78.0% (64.8% – 87.2%) 96.9% (94.6% – 98.3%) 25.24 (13.85 – 46.00) 0.23 (0.14 – 0.38)
% Concordance between Physician and RA = 97.3% (95%CI: 95.2% – 98.5%)
Kappa = 0.88 (95%CI: 0.81 – 0.95)
Combined RA DTS + Physician bCAM 42 8 341 15 84.0% (71.5% – 91.7%) 95.8% (93.2% – 97.4%) 19.94 (11.97 – 33.19) 0.17 (0.09 – 0.32)
RA DTS + RA bCAM 39 11 346 10 78.0% (64.8% – 87.2%) 97.2% (94.9% – 98.5%) 27.77 (14.81 – 52.06) 0.23 (0.13 – 0.38)
Physician DTS + Physician bCAM 41 9 341 15 82.0% (69.2% – 90.2%) 95.8% (93.2% – 97.4%) 19.46 (11.66 – 32.48) 0.19 (0.10 – 0.34)

The Delirium Triage Screen (DTS) and Brief Confusion Assessment Method (bCAM) were performed by the physician and research assistants (RA) in older emergency department patients. Sensitivities, specificities, positive likelihood ratios (PLR) and negative likelihood ratios (NLR) are reported with their 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for the DTS, bCAM and the combined approach. The reference standard for delirium was a psychiatrist assessment using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision criteria.

Abbreviations: TP, true positive; FN, false negative; TN, true negative; FP, false positive.