Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 27.
Published in final edited form as: World Neurosurg. 2011 Nov 11;79(2):394–403. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.12.007

Table 3.

Postoperative and Follow-Up Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Primary Surgical Intervention for Suspected Pituitary Pathology, by Dr. Harvey Cushing at the Johns Hopkins Hospital, 1896 to 1912

Number (%) of Patients Mean ± SD
Transsphenoidal 25
 Hospital stay (days) 34.8 ± 10.0
 Outcome
  “Well/Improved” 16(64)
  “Not improved” 5(20)
  “Dead” 4(16)
 Time to death (months) 18.7 ± 24.8
 Time to last follow-up (months) 37.0 ± 62.7
 Outcome at last follow-up
  “Well/Improved” 9(47)
  “Not Improved” 1 (5.3)
  “Dead” 9(48)
Transcranial 10
 Hospital stay (days) 47.9 ± 45.5
 Outcome
  “Well/Improved” 0(0)
  “Not improved” 8(80)
  “Dead” 2(20)
 Time to death (months) 19.5 ± 36.1
 Time to last follow-up (months) 69.4 ± 110
 Outcome at last follow-up
  “Well/Improved” 0(0)
  “Not Improved” 5(63)
  “Dead” 3(38)
“Omega Incision” 2
 Hospital stay (days) 26.0 ± 1.4
 Outcome
  “Well/Improved” 2(100)
  “Not improved” 0(0)
  “Dead” 0(0)
 Time to death (months) 6.5
 Time to last follow-up (months) 86.4 ± 114
 Outcome at last follow-up
  “Well/Improved” 0(0)
  “Not Improved” 1 (50)
  “Dead” 1 (50)