Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 5;5:6. doi: 10.1186/2041-1480-5-6

Table 2.

Overview of experiments conducted with a single semantic space

For each of the 2 corpora, 10 semantic spaces were induced.
RI spaces
RI_20
RI_2
 
RI_4
 
RI_8
 
RP spaces
 
RP_2
RP_2_sw
RP_4
RP_4_sw
RP_8
RP_8_sw
The induced semantic spaces were combined in 10 different combinations.
Combinations
 
 
 
 
 
 
Identical window size
RI_2, RP_2
RI_4, RP_4
RI_8, RP_8
Identical window size, stop words
RI_2, RP_2_sw
RI_4, RP_4_sw
RI_8, RP_8_sw
Large window size
RI_20, RP_2
RI_20, RP_4
 
Large window size, stop words
RI_20, RP_2_sw
RI_20, RP_4_sw
 
For each combination, 3 combination strategies were evaluated.
Combination strategies RI ⊂ RP30 RP ⊂ RI30 RI + RP  

For each of the two corpora and the conjoint corpus, 30 different combinations were evaluated. The configurations are described according to the following pattern: model_windowSize. For RP, sw means that stop words are retained in the semantic space. For instance, model_20 means a window size of 10+10 was used.