Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Neurosci. 2014 Jan 26;17(3):471–480. doi: 10.1038/nn.3637

Figure 6. TAT-GluN2BCTM specifically knocks down DAPK1 in ischemic brain areas and reduces neuronal damage in the MCAo model of focal ischemia in rats.

Figure 6

(a) Timeline of tissue collection for analysis of DAPK1 degradation in rats. (b) 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining of a series of transverse brain sections showed reliable damage in the ipsilateral side following unilateral MCAo. (c) Black-dashed lines represent brain areas removed for immunoblotting. (d) Immunoblots demonstrate specific DAPK1 knockdown in the infract (Ipsi), but not contralateral (Contra) side following application of TAT-GluN2BCTM (10mg/kg, i.v.; n=3; t(4)=14.459, p<0.001), but not TAT-GluN2B (10mg/kg, i.v.; n=3; t(4)=0.739, p=0.501). β-actin was used as a loading control, two-tailed student’s t-test ***p<0.001 (e) Images of Hematoxylin & Eosin (left) and immunohistochemical DAPK1 staining (right) of adjacent brain sections show that compared with saline (top) and TAT-GluN2B treated (middle) controls, TAT-GluN2BCTM treatment (bottom) selectively reduced infarct area (left) and DAPK1 levels (right) ipsilaterally. (f) Left, images of brain sections stained with Fluorojade B in rats injected with saline (n=6), TAT-GluN2B (n=5) or TAT-GluN2BCTM (n=5) after treatment as shown in a, scale bar 20μm. Right, quantification of cellular damage by counting the number of Fluorojade B-positive cells in each image at 10X magnification. TAT-GluN2BCTM (10mg/kg) displayed more prominent neuroprotection in the cortex (top p<0.001) and striatum (bottom p<0.001) as compared to TAT-GluN2B (10mg/kg). Cortex: H(2)=41.235; p<0.001; striatum: H(2)=38.808; p<0.001. Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA on ranks with Dunn’s post-hoc, bars represent relative mean values±s.e.m, ***,ΔΔΔp<0.001. n represents tissue from 3 animals collected from at least 2 litters. Full-length blots are presented in Supplementary Figure 9.