Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 27;9(2):e89442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089442

Figure 2. Forest graphs of the meta-analysis of RF status and response to anti-TNFα agents.

Figure 2

The overall analysis of RF status showed a pooled RR of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.91–1.05, p = 0.54) and an I2 of 43%. Subgroup analyses on different response criteria revealed no significant differences.