Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 10;43(1):149–159. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt248

Table 4.

Cross-sectional associations between components of height and systolic blood pressure at the mid-childhood visit. Separate multivariable random-effects regression models for each component. Data from participants in Project Viva

Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)
Exposure Model Estimatea (95% CI) P
Height (cm) 1 0.40 (0.31, 0.49) <.0001
2 0.42 (0.31, 0.52) <.0001
3 0.34 (0.24, 0.45) <.0001
4 0.36 (0.25, 0.47) <.0001
Trunk length (cm) 1 0.84 (0.67, 1.01) <.0001
2 0.84 (0.65, 1.03) <.0001
3 0.68 (0.49, 0.87) <.0001
4 0.72 (0.52, 0.92) <.0001
5 0.63 (0.42, 0.83) <.0001
Leg length (cm) 1 0.41 (0.27, 0.55) <.0001
2 0.37 (0.20, 0.53) <.0001
3 0.30 (0.14, 0.46) <.0001
4 0.33 (0.16, 0.49) 0.0002
5 0.13 (−0.03, 0.30) 0.12

aIncrement in BP for each 1-cm increment in height component.

Model 1: adjusted for age, sex, race and measurement conditions (state, arm, cuff size, body position, indicator for the sequence number (1st through 5th)), N = 1086.

Model 2: model 1 + maternal and paternal height and BMI, N = 1028.

Model 3: model 2 + sum of SS + TR skinfold thickenesses measured at the mid-childhood visit, N = 1023.

Model 4: model 3 + maternal education, marital status and household income at the mid-childhood visit, maternal smoking during pregnancy, parity, N = 976.

Model 5: model 3 +the other component of current height (leg length for trunk length and vice versa), N = 1023.