Table 8.
Study | Group (sample size) | 577X allele frequency | X577X genotype frequency | Main findings |
---|---|---|---|---|
Yang et al. 2003 (376) | Sprint (n=73) Endurance (n=40) Controls (n=120) |
0.28 0.46 0.44 |
0.06 0.24 0.18 |
X-allele frequency lower in sprinters vs. controls & endurance |
Niemi et al. 2005 (213) | Sprint (n=73) Endurance (n=40) Control (n=120) |
0.29 0.30 0.32 |
0.09 0.10 0.09 |
No difference in frequencies between athletes and controls |
Lucia et al. 2006 (175) | Cyclists (n=50) Runners (n=52) Controls (n=123) |
0.49 0.46 0.45 |
0.26 0.17 0.18 |
No difference in frequencies between athletes and controls |
Clarkson et al. 2005 (63) | Men (n=182) Women (n=287) |
0.51 0.49 |
0.264 0.268 |
Greater training-induced increase in strength in the X/X vs. R/R homozygotes in women, no difference in men. |
Delmonico et al. 2007 (76) | Men (n=71) Women (n=86) |
0.401 0.471 |
0.211 0.279 |
In women, greater baseline strength in the X/X vs. R/R, but training-induced increase greater in the R/R vs. X/X. |
Moran et al. 2006 (200) | Boys (n=507) Girls (n=439) |
0.42 0.41 |
0.183 0.17 |
R allele associated with faster 40 m sprint time in boys but not in girls |
Roth et al. 2007 (274) | Strength, white (n=52) Control, white (n=668) Strength, black (n=23) Control, black (n=208) |
0.423 0.436 0.283 0.245 |
0.096 0.199 0 0.048 |
Frequency of the X/X genotype lower in athletes vs. controls; no difference in the X allele frequencies. |
Santiago et al. 2007 (277) | Soccer (n=60) Endurance (n=102) Controls (n=123) |
0.33 0.475 0.447 |
0.15 0.215 0.178 |
X-allele frequency lower in soccer players vs. controls. |
Papadimitriou et al. 2008 (227) | Power T&F (n=73) Endurance (n=28) Controls (n=181) |
0.342 0.375 0.461 |
0.164 0.25 0.182 |
X-allele frequency lower in power athletes vs. controls; no difference in the X/X genotype frequencies |
McCauley et al. 2009 (190) | Young men (n=79) | 0.424 | 0.190 | No association with knee extensor muscle strength and contractile properties |
McCauley et al. 2010 (189) | Elderly men (n=100) | 0.365 | 0.16 | No association with isometric or isokinetic knee extensor muscle function |
Norman et al. 2009 (215) | Young men and women (n=120) | 0.454* | 0.250* | Muscle power and fatigue index derived from 30-sec Wingate test were not associated with the genotype |
Saunders et al. 2007 (278) | Fast triathletes (n=152) Mid triathletes (n=152) Slow triathletes (n=153) Controls (n=143) |
0.41 0.42 0.45 0.47 |
0.18 0.19 0.23 0.21 |
No differences in allele and Genotype frequencies between athletes and controls |
Scott et al. 2010 (287) | Jamaica: -Sprint athletes (n=114) -Controls, Jam (n=311) USA: -Sprint Athletes (n=113) -Controls (n=190) |
0.137 0.136 0.187 0.159 |
0.019 0.026 0.037 0.018 |
No differences in allele and genotype frequencies between athletes and controls |
Eynon et al. 2009 (81) | Sprinters (n=81) Endurance (n=74) Controls (n=240) |
0.31 0.57 0.49 |
0.14 0.32 0.18 |
Allele and genotype frequencies significantly different in sprinters than in endurance athletes and controls#. |
Ahmetov et al. 2010 (3) | Endurance (n=456) Controls (n=1211) |
0.332 0.390 |
0.057 0.145 |
Frequency of the X-allele and X/X genotype significantly lower in endurance athletes than in controls. |
Druzhevskaya et al. 2008 (79) | Power athletes (n=486) Controls (n=1197) |
0.333 0.387 |
0.064 0.142 |
Frequency of the X-allele and X/X genotype significantly lower in power athletes than in controls. |
Yang et al. 2007 (377) | Ethiopians: - endurance (n=76) - controls (n=198) Kenyans: - endurance (n=284) - controls (n=158) Nigerians: - power (n=62) - controls (n=60) |
0.309 0.342 0.132 0.085 0.064 0.083 |
0.079 0.111 0.011 0.013 0 0 |
No differences in allele and genotype frequencies between athletes and controls |
Subjects were selected from larger cohort to derive approximately equal number of subjects with each genotype. Therefore, 577X allele frequency is greater than in the general population.
Genotype frequencies in controls deviate significantly from Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium