Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 15.
Published in final edited form as: Methods. 2013 Aug 28;66(2):139–152. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.08.017

Table 1.

Data point values for Figure 3

Tests ED %F STD ROI
count
SSMDa
E%A:D~2 vs. E%A:D~0.5
SSMDb
E%A:D~2 vs. E%A:D~1
R2
E% vs. A:D
#1 0 0 0 6676 0.4953 0.0779 0.7172
#2 0 0 35 6032 0.6127 0.0476 0.6483
#3 0 22 0 4236 0.7184 0.1209 0.7228
#4 0 22 35 4065 0.7692 0.1215 0.7244
#5 0 30 0 1557 0.8569 0.1746 0.7652
#6 0 30 35 1538 0.8649 0.1697 0.7593
#7 0 35 0 648 0.8025 0.3592 0.9116
#8 0 35 35 647 0.7999 0.3592 0.9122
#9 0 30 45 1440 0.8661 0.1452 0.7322
#10 0 38 0 358 0.6960 0.4685 0.9579
#11* 5 0 0 5483 0.6267 0.0571 0.6632
#12 5 0 35 5012 0.6611 0.0527 0.6528
#13 5 22 0 3220 0.8162 0.1401 0.7406
#14 5 22 35 3159 0.8188 0.1389 0.7389
#15* 5 30 0 1179 0.8324 0.2099 0.8001
#16 5 30 35 1176 0.8212 0.2077 0.7995
#17 5 35 0 500 0.6685 0.3189 0.9010
#18 5 35 35 500 0.6685 0.3189 0.9010
#19 5 30 45 1125 0.8130 0.1794 0.7714
#20 5 38 0 280 0.5730 0.4601 0.9774

Notes:

*

#11 corresponds to data point A in Figure 3c–d

**

#15 corresponds to data point B in Figure 3c–d