Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 28;9(2):e90164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090164

Table 2. Comparison of NaCl Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC), Minimal Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) and Killing quotient (KQ) distributions for subgroups of P. aeruginosa CF isolates according to mucoid characteristic, antimicrobial susceptibility pattern, ability to form biofilm and patient under HTS treatment.

NaCl MIC values (in %)
Agar dilution method Broth dilution method NaCl MBC values (in %) Killing quotient (KQ)a
Population Subgroup Isolate type (n) MIC50 MIC90 Range P value d MIC50 MIC90 Range P value d MBC50 MBC90 Range P valued KQ50 KQ90 Range P value d
Total CF isolates Mucoid characteristic Mucoid (25) 3 4 2–4 <0.0001 3 5 0.9–5 <0.0001 7 9 6–>10 0.01 2.3 3.5 1.4–7.8 0.0002
Non-mucoid (60) 5 5 2–6 5 6 2–6 8 10 4–>10 1.6 2.3 1.2–4
Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern Multidrug resistance (22) 3 4 2–5 <0.0001 3 5 2–5 0.0005 8 >10 7–>10 0.3 2.3 3.5 1.4–4 0.002
Non-multidrug resistance (63) 4 5 2–6 5 6 0.9–6 8 9 4–>10 1.8 2.3 1.2–7.8
Ability to form biofilm No (9 of which 3 mucoid) 3 5 2–5 <0.0001 Rs = 0.44 3 5 2–5 <0.0001 Rs = 0.48 7 9 4–9 0.14 2.3 4 1.4–4 0.0009 Rs = 0.37
Weak (42 of which 16 mucoid) 4 5 2–5 4 5 0.9–6 8 10 5–>10 1.8 3.5 1.2–7.8
Moderate (18 of which 3 mucoid) 5 5 2–5 5 6 2–6 8 >10 7–>10 1.8 2.3 1.2–3.5
Strong (16 of which 3 mucoid) 5 6 3–6 5 6 3–6 8 9 6–10 1.5 2 1.2–2.7
Patient under HTS treatment Yes (5) b 2 3 2–3 ND 3 3 2–3 ND >10 >10 8–>10 ND ND ND ND ND
No (80) 4 5 2–6 5 6 0.9–6 8 9 4–>10 1.8 2.7 1.2–7.8
One isolate per type, per patient c Mucoid characteristic Mucoid (18) 3 4 2–4 <0.0001 3 5 2–5 0.0003 7 9 7–>10 0.07 2.3 3.5 1.4–4.5 0.0008
Non-mucoid (30) 5 5 2–6 5 6 2–6 8 9 5–>10 1.5 2.3 1.2–3.3
Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern Multidrug resistance (11) 3 4 2–5 0.002 3 5 2–5 0.005 8 10 7–>10 0.6 2 3.5 1.6–3.5 0.001
Non-multidrugresistance (29) 5 5 2–6 5 6 0.9–6 8 9 5–>10 1.5 2.3 1.2–7.8
Ability to form biofilm No (7 of which 1 mucoid) 3 5 2–5 <0.0001 Rs = 0.5 3 5 2–5 0.0004 Rs = 0.46 7 9 4–9 0.12 2.3 4 1.4–4 0.056
Weak (24 of which 8 mucoid) 4 5 2–5 4 6 2–6 8 10 5–>10 1.6 2·5 1.3–3.5
Moderate (15 of which 3 mucoid) 5 5 2–5 5 6 2–6 8 >10 7–>10 1.8 2·3 1.3–3.5
Strong (11 of which 2 mucoid) 5 6 4–6 5 6 4–6 9 9 7–10 1.5 2 1.3–2
Patient under HTS treatment Yes (1) ND ND 2 ND ND ND 3 ND ND ND >10 ND ND ND ND ND
No (33) 5 5 2–6 5 6 2–6 8 9 5– >10 1.6 2.5 1.2–3.5

MIC50 and MIC90 values were defined as the lowest concentration of NaCl at which 50% and 90% of the isolates were inhibited, respectively.

a

Only isolates exhibiting MBC values within tested range were considered.

b

5 isolates recovered in one patient.

c

isolates were randomly selected.

d

Comparison of MIC, MBC and KQ distribution between subgroups was performed with Mann-Whitney’s test, with the exception of the evaluation depending on biofilm producer groups, assessed by the Kruskal-Wallis’ test, and Spearman correlation coefficient (Rs) when Kruskal-Wallis’ test was positive. A P value ≤0.05 was considered to reflect significance and was indicated in bold type.

ND, not determined either because only one isolate or one patient was included in the sub-population, or because one isolate exhibiting a MBC value within the tested range.