Table 2.
Dysfunction | Study | Diagnostic criteria |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Symptoms | Clinical signs |
||||||||||
Phoria | PFV | NPC | AC/A | BAF | MEM | PRA | VF | FD curve | |||
NFV | NRA | ||||||||||
Convergence insufficiency | 2006, Marran LFa 37 | CISS V-15 symptom questionnaire | Exophoria at near ≥4 Δ greater than at distance Von Graefe method |
PFV failures to reach Sheard's 11criteria or failure to have minimum normative PFV at near, ≤15Δ for break | ≥6 cm break | ||||||
2004, Rouse MW39 | CISS V-15 symptom questionnaire score ≥ 21 | Exophoria at near ≥4 Δ greater than at distance Von Graefe method |
PFV failures to reach Sheard's 11criteria or failure to have minimum normative PFV at near, ≤15Δ for break |
≥6 cm | |||||||
2003, Borsting EJ40 | CISS V-15 symptom questionnaire score ≥ 16 | Exophoria at near ≥4 Δ greater than at distance Von Graefe method |
PFV failures to reach Sheard's 11criteria or failure to have minimum normative PFV at near, ≤15Δ for break | ≥6 cm | |||||||
2002, García,Ab 41 | Reported without questionnaire | Exophoria at near >6 Δ. Cover test method | PFV ≤ 11/14/3 Δ, at least one of three responses of blur/break/recovery | >10 cm break or >17.5 recovery | Calculated AC/A < 3/1 | ≤3 cpm Difficulty clearing +2 D (±2 D) |
<+0.25 D | NRA ≤1.50 D |
|||
1999, Borsting E28 | CIRS symptom questionnaire score ≥9 | Exophoria at near ≥4 Δ greater than at distance Method not specified |
Failed Sheard's criterion or minimum PFV at near, ≤12/15/4 Δ | ≥7.5 cm break | |||||||
1991, Dwyer PS4 | Not reported | Exophoria at near = 12 Δ | PFV = 0 blur/break and recovery | ≤3/1 | Diplopia with 12 Δ Base-out | Type 3 curve | |||||
1986, Daum KM44 | Reported without questionnaire | If the angle at far is ≤5 Δ exophoria, it must be at near at least 4 Δ more exo If the angle at far is ≥6 exophoria, it must be at near at least 10 Δ more exo Cover test method |
NPC: near point of convergence, NFV/PFV: negative/positive fusional vergence, BAF: binocular accommodative facility, MEM: MEM dynamic retinoscopy, PRA/NRA: positive/negative relative accommodation, Δ: prism diopters.
Authors consider having an exophoria at near a fundamental sign and CI may be diagnosed with one, two or three clinical signs.
Authors diagnose CI considering exophoria, PFV and NPC as fundamental signs and patients must have at least two signs of the remaining four signs.