Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 9;7(1):2–21. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2013.01.004

Table 4.

Diagnostic criteria used for accommodative anomalies.

Dysfunction Study Diagnostic criteria
Symptoms Clinical signs
AA MAF BAF MEM PRA NRA Visual acuity Refractive error
Accommodative insufficiency 2006, Marran LF37 CISS V-15 symptom questionnaire Monocular AA 2 D ≤ Hofstetter's minimum age formula: 15–0.25 × age
Monocular Push up method
2006, Sterner B38 Reported by several questions AA < 8 D monocular and < 10 D binocular AA
Monocular Push-up method
2002, García, Aa 41 Reported without questionnaire Reduced AA: at least 2 D < minimum age appropriate amplitude of Hofstetter's formula (15–0.25 × age)
Monocular Push-up method
≤6 cpm
Difficulty clearing
−2 D
(±2 D)
≤3 cpm
Difficulty clearing
−2 D
(±2 D)
>+0.75 D ≤1.25 D
2002, Cacho Pb 29 Reported without questionnaire Reduced AA: at least 2 D < minimum age appropriate amplitude of Hofstetter's formula (15–0.25 × age)
Monocular Push-up method
≤6 cpm
Difficulty clearing
−2 D
(±2 D)
≤3 cpm
Difficulty clearing
−2 D
(±2 D)
>+0.75 D ≤1.25 D
1991, Dwyer PS4 Not reported AA 3 D < Hofstetter's formula: 15–0.25 × age Blurred with −2 D (±2 D) ≥+1.00 D ≤1.00 D
1988, Chrousos GA45 Reported without questionnaire AA below the normal for the patients’ ages
Monocular push-up method



Accommodative excess 2002, García, Ac 41 Reported without questionnaire ≤6 cpm
Difficulty clearing
−2 D
(±2 D)
≤3 cpm
Difficulty clearing
+2 D
(±2 D)
<0 D High finding
≥3.50 D
≤1.50 D Variable Variable retinoscopy and subjective refraction
1991, Dwyer PS4 Not reported Blurred with +2 D (±2 D) ≤−0.50 D ≤1.00 D
1988, Rutsein RP42 Reported without questionnaire A lead movement. Value not specified Varies. May be somewhat reduced Varies (frequently emmetropia)



Accommodative infacility 1991, Dwyer PS4 Not reported Disorder of facility (values not specified)

AA: accommodative amplitude, MAF: monocular accommodative facility, BAF: binocular accommodative facility, MEM: MEM dynamic retinoscopy, PRA: positive relative accommodation, NRA: negative relative accommodation.

a

Authors consider AA and MAF as fundamental signs and patients must have at least two signs of the rest of three signs.

b

Authors consider AA and MAF fundamental signs, being BAF, MEM and PRA complementary signs.

c

Authors consider VA, Refractive error and MAF as fundamental signs and patients must have at least two signs of the rest of three signs.