Table 4.
Disease relapse: local-regional versus distant: impact of TN category and treatment
TN Category | Local-Regional Relapse
|
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RT plus 5-FU/MMC Arm
|
RT plus 5-FU/CDDP Arm
|
|||||||
TF/No. of Patients | 3 y %‡ | HR (95% CI) | P value† | TF/No. of Patients | 3 y % | HR (95% CI) | P value† | |
Node Negative | ||||||||
T2N0 | 19/161 | 10 | 1.00 | 38/162 | 19 | 1.00 | ||
T3N0 | 11/51 | 22 | 1.98 (0.94-4.15) | .072 | 6/45 | 13 | 0.59 (.25-1.39) | .22 |
T4N0 | 5/15 | 27 | 3.23 (1.21-8.66) | .02 | 6/16 | 38 | 2.13 (0.90-5.04) | .087 |
Node Positive | ||||||||
T2N1-3 | 10/46 | 18 | 1.97 (0.92-4.24) | .083 | 16/53 | 28 | 1.42 (0.79-2.55) | .24 |
T3N1-3 | 8/21 | 38 | 4.09 (1.79-9.36) | .0009 | 12/25 | 49 | 2.85 (1.49-5.46) | .0016 |
T4N1-3 | 11/18 | 61 | 8.00 (3.79-16.91) | <.0001 | 4/7 | 57 | 3.06 (1.09-8.58) | .033 |
P value* | <.0001 | .0032 | ||||||
| ||||||||
TN Category | Distant Metastases
|
|||||||
RT plus 5-FU/MMC Arm
|
RT plus 5-FU/CDDP Arm
|
|||||||
TF/No. of Patients | 3 y %‡ | HR (95% CI) | P value† | TF/No. of Patients | 3 y % | HR (95% CI) | P value† | |
| ||||||||
Node Negative | ||||||||
T2N0 | 14/161 | 7 | 1.00 | 24/162 | 12 | 1.00 | ||
T3N0 | 8/51 | 14 | 1.91 (0.80-4.56) | .14 | 5/45 | 9 | 0.81 (0.31-2.12) | .66 |
T4N0 | 3/15 | 14 | 2.49 (0.72-8.67) | .15 | 4/16 | 19 | 2.04 (0.71-5.88) | .19 |
Node Positive | ||||||||
T2N1-3 | 11/46 | 19 | 3.00 (1.36-6.61) | .0064 | 17/53 | 26 | 2.57 (1.38-4.78) | .0029 |
T3N1-3 | 3/21 | 10 | 2.01 (0.58-7.02) | .27 | 8/25 | 33 | 2.91 (1.30-6.48) | .0091 |
T4N1-3 | 6/18 | 28 | 6.36 (2.43-16.63) | .0002 | 0/7 | 0 | - | - |
P value* | .015 | .0093 |
Abbreviations: CDDP = cisplatin; CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio; MMC = mitomycin; TF = total failures.
P value from the Gray’s test.
P value from χ2 test using the Cox proportional hazards model.
Some 3-year estimates might be unstable due to small sample sizes and, therefore, too few patients at risk at 3 years.