Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 2.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2012 Apr 10;125(19):2334–2342. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.073239

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Correlation between LVESV and LVESD in MR patients (A) and control subjects (B). The solid lines represent the fitted model for the LVESD vs. LVESV relation with 95% confidence intervals (dash lines), which is cubic in MR patients (n=94) and quadratic in controls (n =51). Data of calculated LVESV using the Bullet formula are shown as dark cyan points in (A) and (B). The difference between the measured LVESV from summated short axis images and calculated LVESV from Bullet formula in MR were plotted in (C) vs. LVES circumferential curvature at distal LV. The solid back line in (C) represents the fitted model.