Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Oct 4;131(3):535–540. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.09.032

Table 4.

Comparison of response rates for platinum- and bevacizumab-containing Phase II regimens for recurrent ovarian cancer.

Authors Agents n %PS %PR OR 6-month PFS Platinum- Sensitive Platinum- Resistant Combined Population

PFS OS PFS OS PFS OS
Matulonis 2008 Carbo + bev 44 100 - 51 NR 7.6 20.3 - - - -
Sehouli 2011 Carbo + pem 61 100 - 33 NR 9.4 NR - - - -
Burger 2007 Bev 62 58 42 21 NR - - - - 4.7 17
Cannistra 2007 Bev 44 - 84 16 NR - - 4.4 10.7 - -
Garcia 2008 Bev + oral cyclophos 70 60 40 33 56 10 20 5 12 7.2 16.9
McGonigle 2011 Bev + topotecan 40 - 100 25 55 - - 7.8 16.6 - -
Kudoh 2011 Bev + PLD 30 4 96 33 47 - - 6 NR - -
del Carmen 2012 Bev + PLD 54 100 - 72 NR 14 NR - - - -
Current Study Bev + pem 34 65 35 41 56 8.4 26.5 5.6 16.7 7.9 25.7

PS = platinum-sensitive; PR = platinum-resistant; OR = overall response; 6-month PFS = progression-free survival; PFS = median progression-free survival in months; OS = median overall survival in months; Bev = bevacizumab; pem = pemetrexed; cyclophos = cyclophosphamide; NR= not reported.