Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 2.
Published in final edited form as: Stata J. 2012 Oct 1;12(4):718–725.

Table 1.

Comparisons of Design-Based 95% Confidence Intervals for Selected Parameters using Alternative Design Effect Adjustments (Source: MTF 2007-2009).

95% Confidence Interva s:
Parameter Weighted Estimate Without Adjustment for Stratification and Clustering With “Double Adjustment” for Weighting With Correct Adjustment
Proportion: Nasal Administration 0.3627 (0.3124, 0.4130) (0.2915, 0.4339) (0.3015, 0.4239)
AOR: NMPM vs. MPNM 6.0120 (2.1230, 17.0245)** (1.3798, 26.1973)* (1.8067, 20.0071)**
AOR: NMO vs. MPNM 7.6826 (2.7874, 21.1746)*** (1.8320, 32.2206)** (2.3923, 24.6734)***

NOTES: AOR = Adjusted Odds Ratio. NMPM = Nonmedical Use Prior to Medical Use. MPNM = Medical Use Prior to Nonmedical Use. NMO = Nonmedical Use Only. t-test of null hypothesis that regression parameter is equal to 0:

***

p < 0.001

**

p < 0.01

*

p < 0.05.