Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 12.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Oct 3;92(5):575–583. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2012.137

Table 2.

Model parameter estimates for the final ritonavir (left column) and joint ritonavir-atazanavir (right column) PK-PG model using a gold standard analysis. Relative standard errors, obtained by nonparametric bootstrap (n=100) and expressed in percentages, are given in parenthesis.

Ritonavir Atazanavir
CL/F (L/h) 10.3 (9) 16.0** (64)
βCYP3A5*1 - 1.28 (59)
AUC50 of RTV (ng.h/mL) - 6,230 (91)
Emax - 0.98 (3)
V/F (L) 87.9 (11) 81.1 (6)
ka (h−1) 3.9 (58) 3.3 (146)
MTT (h) 1.1 (16) 1.36 (14)
NN 14.4 (95) 11.5 (29)
BSV (CL/F) * 38.5 (33) 31 (28)
BSV (V/F) * 37.3 (50) 31 (33)
Correlation (CL/F-V/F) 0.74 (45) -
BSV (ka) * 248 (161) 81 (133)
BSV (MTT) * 49.3 (77) 44 (39)
RV week 4 (%) * 40.8 (8) 19.4 (16)
RV > week 4 (%) * 40.8 (8) 42.3 (10)
*

BSV=Between-subject variability, RV=Residual variability,

**

(CL/F)0=atazanavir CL in absence of ritonavir, MTT=mean transit time, NN=number of transit compartments, ka=absorption rate constant, AUC50 – ritonavir exposure needed for half maximal boosting effect, Emax – maximal effect of ritonavir boosting, βCYP3A5*1 – factor of increase in atazanavir CL with at least one copy of CYP3A5*1 allele, RV=residual variability