Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 3.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Oct;199(4):375.e1–375.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.040

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of the study population according to the presence or absence of labor as well as cervical dilatation

Characteristics No labor
(Group 1, n = 775)
Pa Early labor
(Group 2, n = 86)
Pb Active labor
(Group 3, n = 23)
Pc Pd
Maternal age (y, median and range)e 32 (17–46) NS 33 (24–44) NS 30 (22–38) NS NSf
Nulliparity 149 (19.2%) NS 23 (26.7%) < .01 14 (60.9%) < .001 < .001g
Gestational age at delivery (wks, median and range) 38.4 (37.0–41.6) .076 38.1 (37.0–42.0) < .001 39.9 (37.6–42.1) < .001 < .001f
Birthweight (g, median and range)e 3230 (1900–5410) NS 3205 (1730–4740) < .05 3510 (2850–4890) < .05 < .05f
Indication for cesarean delivery
  Previous cesarean section 579 (74.7%) 49 (57.0%) 4 (17.4%)
  Malpresentation 105 (13.5%) 11 (12.8%) 2 (8.7%)
  Placenta previa 26 (3.4%) 4 (4.7%) 0 (0%)
  Previous uterine surgery 24 (3.1%) 1 (1.2%) 0 (0%)
  Nonreassuring fetal heart testing 5 (0.6%) 8 (9.3%) 4 (17.4%)
  Fetal macrosomia 8 (1.0%) 4 (4.7%) 2 (8.7%)
  Failure to progress 0 (0%) 1 (1.2%) 11 (47.8%)
  Others 28 (3.6%) 8 (9.3%) 0 (0%)
AF WBC count (cells/mm3)e 2 (0 to > 1000) NS 3 (0 to > 1000) < .05 10 (0 to > 1000) < .001 < .005f
Positive AF culture 6 (0.8%) .052 3 (3.5%) NS 3 (13.0%) < .01 < .001g
Histologic chorioamnionitis 34 (4.4%) < .01 10 (11.6%) < .05 7 (30.4%) < .001 < .001g
Funisitis 8 (1.0%) NS 2 (2.3%) NS 0 (0%) NS NSg

AF, AMNIOTIC FLUID; NS, not significant; WBC, white blood cell.

a

Comparison between Groups 1 and 2.

b

Comparison between Groups 2 and 3.

c

Comparison between Groups 1 and 3.

d

Comparison between Groups 1, 2, and 3.

e

Values are given as median and range.

f

By Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance test.

g

By χ2 test.