Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 27;2:e269. doi: 10.7717/peerj.269

Table 1. Overall changes in mean summary statistics of pollinator movement for the different models.

⇑⇑ / ⇓⇓: strong increase/decrease across the range of the parameter changed, with most post-hoc comparisons significant (see Supplemental Information 10); ⇑ / ⇓: moderate increase/decrease across the range of the parameter changed, with some post-hoc comparisons significant; (⇓): significant decrease in response to parameter being changed only significant at one extreme end of range considered; —: no obvious pattern in response to parameter being changed, regardless of significance (or lack of significance) in post-hoc comparisons. Statistics reported are for likelihood ratio tests.

Maximum distance
from nest
Number of habitat
changes
Proportion of time
spent in wild habitat
Model 1: increasing pF ⇑⇑ χ52=4768.9,p<0.001 χ52=14.4,p=0.013 χ52=91.1,p<0.001
Model 2: decreasing r ⇑⇑ χ132=542.2,p<0.001 ⇑⇑ χ52=10446.0,p<0.001 ⇓⇓ χ132=4213.7,p<0.001
Model 3: increasing set-aside number (⇓) χ102=71.5,p<0.001 ⇓⇓ χ102=1225.0,p<0.001 ⇑⇑ χ102=3154.0,p<0.001
Model 3a: increasing set-aside number with no movement into cultivated fields ⇑⇑ χ102=1146.8,p<0.001
Model 4: increasing number of hedgerows removed χ102=56.5,p<0.001 χ102=90.5,p<0.001 (⇓) χ102=52.5,p<0.001
Model 4a: increasing number of hedgerows removed with no movement into cultivated fields χ102=22.2,p=0.014