Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 3;9(3):e90597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090597

Figure 3. Frequency distribution of rs10886471 (CA)n alleles in the four groups.

Figure 3

Not all comparisons are shown. The allelic frequencies of (CA)16 in the IFG, IGT, and T2DM groups wasmuch higher than that in the NFG group (△ X 2 = 12.300, P = 0.000; □ X 2 = 13.672, P = 0.000;▪ X 2 = 14.476,P = 0.000, respectively). The allelic frequency of (CA)16 was significantly lower than that of (CA)17, but higher than those of (CA)18 and (CA)19 among the four groups (△△ X 2 = 16.190, P = 0.001; □□ X 2 = 10.221,P = 0.017; ▪▪ X 2 = 8.265, P = 0.041, respectively).