Table 1.
Extent of intended and unintended damage in Group Neo-Oasp.
| Cases | Areas 11 and 13 | Area 10 | Area 12 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L | R | Avg | W | L | R | Avg | W | L | R | Avg | W | |
| Neo-Oasp-1 | 86.8 | 83.1 | 85.0 | 71.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40.2 | 11.0 | 25.6 | 4.4 |
| Neo-Oasp-2 | 81.0 | 97.8 | 89.4 | 79.6 | 5.3 | 0 | 2.6 | 0 | 9.3 | 1.4 | 5.4 | 0.1 |
| Neo-Oasp-3 | 96.4 | 91.2 | 93.8 | 88.0 | 7.4 | 12.3 | 9.8 | 0.9 | 22.3 | 21.6 | 22.0 | 4.8 |
| Neo-Oasp-4 | 85.7 | 94.8 | 90.2 | 81.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.8 | 4.0 | 3.4 | 0.1 |
| Neo-Oasp-5 | 90.4 | 98.0 | 94.3 | 88.6 | 6.2 | 10.2 | 8.2 | 0.6 | 18.5 | 22.8 | 20.6 | 4.2 |
| X | 88.1 | 93.0 | 90.5 | 81.8 | 3.78 | 4.5 | 4.1 | 0.3 | 18.6 | 12.2 | 15.4 | 2.7 |
| Cases | Area 14 | Ia | Area 46 | |||||||||
| L | R | Avg | W | L | R | Avg | W | L | R | Avg | W | |
| Neo-Oasp-1 | 8.0 | 10.2 | 9.1 | 0.8 | 11.6 | 3.4 | 7.5 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Neo-Oasp-2 | 31.9 | 6.8 | 19.4 | 2.2 | 78.5 | 57.7 | 68.1 | 45.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Neo-Oasp-3 | 18.7 | 11.6 | 15.1 | 2.2 | 16.5 | 13.8 | 15.1 | 2.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Neo-Oasp-4 | 9.7 | 12.6 | 11.2 | 1.2 | 82.5 | 64.6 | 73.6 | 53.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Neo-Oasp-5 | 6.5 | 11.0 | 8.5 | 0.7 | 87.0 | 67.8 | 77.4 | 59.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| X | 15.0 | 10.4 | 12.7 | 1.4 | 55.2 | 41.5 | 48.3 | 32.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Data are the estimated percentage of damage as assessed from MR (post-surgical T1) images. L, percentage of damage to the left hemisphere; R, percentage of damage to the right hemisphere; Avg, average of L and R; W = (L × R)/100 [weighted index as defined by Hodos and Bobko (1984)]; X, group mean. Areas 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 46, cytoarchitectonic subregions of the macaque frontal lobe and Ia, agranular insular areas as defined by Carmichael and Price (1994).