Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 5;2014:384583. doi: 10.1155/2014/384583

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) Body weight (g; n = 7; *P < 0.05 CONT versus FRUCTMIN (Δ body weight (g; n = 7), between weeks 8 and 0 in the inset; # P < 0.01 FRUCT and FRUCTMIN versus CONT)), (b) food ingestion (g; n = 7; *P < 0.05 CONT versus FRUCTMIN, and (c) fluid ingestion evolution (mL; n = 7; + P < 0.05 CONT versus FRUCT and FRUCTMIN; # P < 0.001 CONT versus FRUCT and FRUCTMIN; $ P < 0.05 CONT versus FRUCT and P < 0.01 CONT versus FRUCTMIN; $$ P < 0.01 CONT versus FRUCT and P < 0.05 CONT versus FRUCTMIN; **P < 0.01 CONT versus FRUCTMIN), during the dietary intervention. Results were expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean. CONT: control; FRUCT: 10% fructose in tap water; FRUCTMIN: 10% fructose in natural mineral-rich water.