Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 1;14:39. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-14-39

Table 3.

Comparison of prediction performance between the SITS SICH risk score and the extended risk score

  Odds ratio (95% CI) per point Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic P AUC (95% CI) Difference between areas P Net reclassification improvement P
SICH per NINDS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  SITS SICH risk score
1.35 (1.11-1.64)
1.72
0.887
0.624 (0.533-0.714)
-
-
-
-
  Extended risk score
1.30 (1.15-1.46)
4.30
0.745
0.704 (0.618-0.791)
0.081
0.015
22.3%
0.011
SICH per ECASS II
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  SITS SICH risk score
1.34 (1.08-1.68)
3.25
0.661
0.612 (0.503-0.721)
-
-
-
-
  Extended risk score
1.30 (1.13-1.49)
4.23
0.752
0.703 (0.611-0.796)
0.091
0.016
21.2%
0.018
SICH per SITS-MOST
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  SITS SICH risk score
1.49 (1.14-1.94)
2.10
0.835
0.678 (0.563-0.793)
-
-
-
-
  Extended risk score 1.33 (1.12-1.58) 6.45 0.488 0.723 (0.622-0.824) 0.044 0.293 24.5% 0.024

AUC indicates area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CI: confidence intervals; ECASS: The European-Australasian Cooperative Acute Stroke Study; NINDS: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; SICH: symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage; SITS-MOST: the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke - Monitoring Study.