Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 2;2014:141909. doi: 10.1155/2014/141909

Table 3.

Quantification of major hindgut bacterial diversity present in meat goat (n = 6) as analyzed using bTEFAP pyrosequencing method1.

Item Diets2 SEM P values3
Control 15% PB 30% PB L Q
Acinetobacter haemolyticus 1.1 1.2 0.2 0.06 0.32 0.54
Acinetobacter lwoffii 7.0 6.5 0.3 3.70 0.22 0.56
Acinetobacter radioresistens 1.4 4.2 1.1 0.92 0.80 0.03
Acinetobacter rhizosphaerae 1.1 1.5 0.9 0.47 0.76 0.39
Acinetobacter schindleri 3.4 8.5 5.3 0.82 0.46 0.11
Bacteroides capillosus 0.5 1.1 2.7 0.60 0.02 0.52
Clostridium orbiscindens 0.02 1.4 2.3 0.48 0.03 0.92
Comamonas aquatica 2.4 3.9 4.7 1.43 0.25 0.88
Enterobacter hormaechei 0.8 3.3 2.0 0.95 0.42 0.16
Escherichia albertii 0.6 1.5 0.9 0.53 0.73 0.25
Escherichia fergusonii 0.6 1.9 1.2 0.60 0.49 0.18
Flavobacterium columnare 0.4 2.0 0.5 0.83 0.91 0.18
Flavobacterium gelidilacus 5.81 1.2 1.7 1.14 0.02 1.10
Flavobacterium succinicans 1.7 0.2 1.3 1.80 0.58 0.15
Myroides odoratimimus 7.8 4.5 1.2 2.58 0.09 0.99
Oscillospira guilliermondii 0.99 1.2 3.0 0.69 0.06 0.38
Sphingobacterium faecium 1.2 4.4 0.53 1.09 0.83 0.16
Sphingobacterium mizutaii 1.8 0.6 1.4 0.41 0.40 0.07
Stenotrophomonas koreensis 23.9 9.9 17.2 7.40 0.53 0.28
Rummeliibacillus pycnus 8.54 9.9 6.9 0.35 0.75 0.63

1Data were presented with a cutoff value of 0.9%.

2Control (0% PB), 15% PB, and 30% PB on an as-fed basis.

3Polynomial contrasts for equally spaced treatments.

L: linear effect; Q: quadratic effect.