Table 4. Experimental results of the comparing systems for finding similar questions.
Models | BC | BCF | upBC | STM | LDAC | LDACF |
AP | 0.543 | 0.556 | 0.564 | 0.575 | 0.638 | † |
% AP improvements over | ||||||
BC | N/A | +2.39 | +3.87 | +5.89 | +17.50 | +20.81 |
BCF | N/A | N/A | +1.44 | +3.42 | +14.75 | +17.99 |
upBC | N/A | N/A | N/A | +1.95 | +13.12 | +16.31 |
STM | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | +10.96 | +14.09 |
LDAC | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | +2.82 |
p@1 | 0.550 | 0.561 | 0.577 | 0.585 | 0.648 | † |
indicates the results of our proposed methods are statistical significance over the four baseline methods (within 0.95 confidence interval using the -test). The results of our proposed approach are in bold.